Actually, you are the one who is emotional and histerical and blinded. Facts? Such as, the 17 year old was not engaged in any criminal behavior? So, neither was Mr Zimmerman. Fact? Mr. Zimmerman was part of the neighborhood watch, he noticed an unknown individual in his neighborhood wandering in the rain, and called the police. No problem so far.
Facts? Such as Zimmerman, on the 911 logs, stated he was following the 17 year old (by way of leaving his truck). So? He was trying to keep an eye on the suspicious person in his neighborhood until the police arrived. Again, no problem.
Facts? Such as the police dispatch told Zimmerman he did NOT need to follow the 17 year old? Fact? Zimmerman's response was OK and he stopped pursuing.
Are those the FACTS you're speaking of? Yes, as a matter of FACT, those are the FACTS I was speaking of (along with the facts I included which you so conveniently omitted).
Or, do you have some facts that no one else in the world has or have reported which definitively demonstrated who initiated the confrontation? No, don't have that info. But you're certainly doing your best to try and convince yourself and others with selective "facts" that Zimmerman is the guilty party. Logically, the COMPLETE facts don't support your contention.
As to my hysteria level - I leave that to the judgment of others on the forum.
I’ve seen over the course of the past 7 years probably hundreds of unknown individuals walking, biking, skateboarding, rollerblading, driving, etc, etc, through my neighborhood. No one has yet shot and killed a single one. I live in a neighborhood which is predominately white. We’ve had people of all colors, races, creeds, etc that have gone up and down our street. Yet, no one’s been beaten up, shot, nor killed. It is a poor argument that it is okay to stalk, and then shoot someone for the simple reason of being somemone who isn’t know to the person doing the shooting. Here’s some facts you should consider. There is a dead 17 year old. There has been no evidence presented which supports the contention that the 17 year was doing or had done or was going to do anything illegal. Are you suggesting that you are fine with these facts?