Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: heartwood

That is an OLD photo of the kid, here is a RECENT one...

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQk1cqWPOoXOdmPZdGepQm-uF2b7aMSaze1fzPqyPcFn7Cw0hJiKA

Not such an innocent looking little boy in the above photo like the MSM wants everyone to believe. The kid was suspended from school for TEN days unlike what MSM media says three days and some say five, it was TEN. Parents lawyer won’t release a reason for suspension either.


105 posted on 03/22/2012 9:26:11 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: kcvl

No kidding the media were using old pictures of Martin. That was obvious from the start. Just because the media has an agenda doesn’t make Martin guilty.

My son was suspended from school, for hitting a kid who was harassing him in the bathroom. My son was 6’1 at seventeen. My son was not the sweet-faced little boy he used to be. Did that make him fair game for stalking? And shooting?

I am perfectly aware of the difference between a 13 y.o. and a 17 y.o. They grow up into hulking teenagers. That itself doesn’t make them thieves or assailants.

Hell, Zimmerman was a teenage boy ten years ago. If he had a brain in his self-important little head, he’d have considered how a teenager might react to being stalked.


121 posted on 03/22/2012 10:06:00 PM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson