Replies

OK, well I will just bet that Santorum and Gingrich both talk in terms of “sacrifice” when it comes to reducing government spending.

We'll see. If they do, it speaks for it's self, doesn't it?

For one thing a lot of spending that needs to be cut is in terms of social security and other programs which a lot of people were depending on.

First, those programs (which are unconstitutional to begin with, but are third rails) need to have their funding put into dedicated accounts, not the general fund. You and I both know these are nothing but political footballs, the concept of these ideas must be reversed...I know, all but impossible.

I agree denying funding for contraceptives is not much of a sacrifice.

Really, "not so much a sacrifice"? Where in the Constitution does it say anyone can take my money to pay for another's playtime? Seems to me I'm the one who is sacrificing, actually I'm getting raped.

I also will bet the other candidates, with the possible exception of Ron Paul, have not argued that all these government programs are “unconstitutional”.

Ah, I get it now, a Paul bot, good luck with that. Where is Paul on this BTW?

But if you want to argue that calling for sacrifice by cutting government spending is lib talk, that’s fine.

That's not what I wrote.

I think it’s nit picking when in this case Romney told the woman if she wants freebies, to vote for Obama. I think that was pretty clear.

FUMR