This would make the situation rather complicated for those calling for NATO to get involved.
To: Wilderness Conservative
RIA, a news outlet with strong ties to the Kremlin Sheesh. Who do you believe in this?
The RIA, or ABC, a news outlet with strong ties to the White House?
2 posted on
03/19/2012 1:05:52 PM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Wilderness Conservative
This was telegraphed a few weeks ago. Good to see Vald is back in charge playing chess while OBUMMER and Hiltary are playing checkers.
3 posted on
03/19/2012 1:05:58 PM PDT by
crosslink
(Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
To: Wilderness Conservative
Good news. Keeps Obama from launching a Syrian war for political reasons. Iran is still open, though.
4 posted on
03/19/2012 1:08:31 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: Wilderness Conservative
Israel ever since its security council proceeded to give the go ahead in a 8-6 vote to attack Iran.
Gee, you’d of thought THAT would have made the news
somewhere.
6 posted on
03/19/2012 1:11:01 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Wilderness Conservative
NATO is not going to get involved now that Russia has entered the Syrian conflict.
NATO does not like to fight a real enemy especially when he lives right next door. Remember how it pussyfooted with Qaddafi? And Putin ain’t no Qaddafi.
11 posted on
03/19/2012 1:30:02 PM PDT by
353FMG
To: Wilderness Conservative
Which begs the question: is everyone now dead set on having war in Syria, and by proxy, Iran? This is about getting the USA to go up against Russia and China....Syria/Iran are just the bait.
12 posted on
03/19/2012 1:33:22 PM PDT by
caww
To: Wilderness Conservative
Russia has spent $$ improving the Port of Tartus. Dredging. Roads to/from. Housing areas. Ok, barracks. It will serve their needs in the Med. Sea. Power projection and all that.
16 posted on
03/19/2012 1:58:26 PM PDT by
donozark
(We're ALL Greeks now...)
To: Wilderness Conservative
I've been tracking the Russian Navy Tanker for weeks now from Morse Code. The story is pretty lame. Why on earth would a ship carrying troops for a mission in Syria send positional data every six hours using Morse Code? Even the previous auxiliary vessels that were in Syria were using transmitting weather and sea states in Morse Code. The Russians also reported a routine protection force on those vessels. Standard procedure for any vessel visiting and especially when the auxiliaries are crewed mainly by civilians.
See my post #6
Link to Freepers thread
22 posted on
03/21/2012 2:36:30 PM PDT by
Tommyjo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson