So what’s in it for Zero to sign such an act. What does he gain by the act of such signing?
The only thing I can gather (and the most likely thing) is this causes all the little functionaries go to off to their little cubby holes and start implementing this defacto takeover of all phases of American life. The Ag secretary has to figure out how exactly to control all the food resources. The Interior secretary (or whoever) the water resources and on down the line.
My point? Simply that the thing to be afraid of is not only the order itself but the motivation behind it. It’s like the iron fist is coming out from inside the glove.
Anyone see a parallel between this maneuver by Obama and Hitler's "Law to Remedy the Distress of the People and the Nation"? (Enabling Act of 1933)
The "Chancellor" aka "General Secretary of the Central Committee of the United States of America" will appoint the necessary henchmen to control national resources.
The US Congress is already becoming increasingly vestigial.
The "progressives" are employing a combination of Soviet and Nazi tactics.
If this is decree meaningless, why did 0 bother to issue it?
No, this is the legalistic rationale for expanding federal power. There is nothing stopping this from being another NRA (National Recovery Administration).
The NRA of the 1930s was eventually thrown out by the Supreme Court, which (IIRC) ruled that the Commerce Clause did not extend to such extremes. This degree appears to rely on the function of the President as Commander in Chief, and on some obscure laws conveniently vague as to be stretched for any purpose.
In the 1930s, theCourt was attacked by FDR, who tried to enlarge it so as to fill it with new, obedient, zombie appointees. This failed for political reasons.
But now 0 is but one member away from gaining a truly obedient majority on the Court, through appointing various dopey nonentities and affirmative-action celebrities. The two women on the Supreme Court are the most brainless of the zombies, both totally unqualified except as tokens intended to please their respective minorities.
The last was the “wise Latina.” Just how is the supposed wisdom of this person related to her being a Latina? Are Latinas known for their especial wisdom? Then please tell us which groups they surpass in wisdom! Is a Latina wiser than a non-Hispanic woman, or wiser than an Hispanic man; or wiser than a Black, or an Asian? Inquiring minds want to know.
It is all completely phony, but also dangerous. Truly, our freedoms are slipping through our hands.