To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Multiple other actual polls have shown the opposite which were prominently discussed here - as I’m sure you are aware (I’m sure those polls had no credibility because they didn’t have the results you wanted to display, and now this one is because it shows what you want). Information showed that primaries Santorum narrowly won or narrowly lost he would have won handily over Romney without Gingrich in the race, with Romney winning handily with Santorum out of the race.
To: Republican Wildcat
Im sure those polls had no credibility because they didnt have the results you wanted to display,
That attitude seems to be pretty common among the people who puff their chests out about fighting the media and then repeat what the media says without end if they agree.
Seems to me that Rick Santorum has stood up in the face of a sustained media assault more than a month long so far.
43 posted on
03/17/2012 8:48:44 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: Republican Wildcat
I do recall the Feb. 11
PPP poll taken at the peak of Santorum's surge (and by that, I only mean the anomalous 'cycling' to the apex of the national polls that every GOP candidate has had this primary cycle) just after his trifecta. That one included Paul, though.
- "The best thing Romney might have going for him right now is Gingrich's continued presence in the race. If Gingrich dropped out 58% of his supporters say they would move to Santorum, while 22% would go to Romney and 17% to Paul."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson