Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pelham

The tariff amounts paid by the south were not exorbitant. In fact the amount of tariff paid in southern ports was a small fraction of the amount paid in northern ports. By contrast, southern exports were protected by the US Navy, and US Army was distributed among southern states in various forts, built by the US government, with localities benefiting from the building of the forts.


160 posted on 04/01/2012 12:46:31 AM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: donmeaker

“The tariff amounts paid by the south were not exorbitant. In fact the amount of tariff paid in southern ports was a small fraction of the amount paid in northern ports.”

You have it exactly backwards.

The industrial north wasn’t importing manufactured goods, they were producing them. Their industries were protected from lower priced European competition by the tariff. Their wages and profits benefited from the tariff.

The agricultural south purchased its manufactured goods from outside the south. The tariff raised the cost to them of imported European manufactures, or if they bought from the north required them to pay the higher prices that northern industries could command due to the protection rendered by the tariff.

Go try to sell your tariff theory to some libertarians, they’ll give you a lesson in how tariffs work.


166 posted on 04/01/2012 8:20:37 PM PDT by Pelham (Marco Rubio, la raza trojan horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson