So your well-established definition of pornography is that the offender is “the most heinous pusher of the most revolting perversion imaginable.” Funny but I don’t recall ever seeing that language being used by the courts before. Is that from the Ninth Circuit perhaps?
Anyway, I’m not arguing with you. I certainly don’t want to be on the side of Obama and the Godless porn-loving sodomite democrats.
You already know what the legal definition of obscenity is because you said it was vague and problematic. The courts of this nation disagree and I disagree. I gave you an example of a federal prosecution under President Bush of a pornographer for breaking obscenity laws. Rick Santorum is 100% right. President Bush enforced obscenity laws and the illegitimate usurper Obama has not enforced the law which you apparently agree with and approve of because you said that enforcing the law would open a can of worms. You should take your support for the disgusting communist Obama and his sodomite pornography agenda somewhere else. Support for Obama and his policies in favor of obscene pornography are not welcome here.