...You OK with that, PapaBear? Even if it were a relative, or a friend's kid?
If it were a relative or friend's kid, she would not be in that position, because I would help take care of her. And those who really care about girls in that situation (I notice you don't seem to care as much about boys) could help her out by helping her get conventional employment.
Many such girls, though, are broken. They have emotional, mental, addiction, or cognitive issues that preclude them from conventional employment. They are in porn because all the alternatives are worse (and yes, there are worse alternatives to being in porn).
Nice cheap shot about the boys, Papa. Really enhances your argument.
Are you seriously saying that the thousands upon thousands of trafficked children (we were talking about women because YOU were referring to the harmlessness of ogling other women's breasts, not because the problem doesn't exist with boys as well) can all be 'helped out' by someone's offering them a job? C'mon now. That's absurd.
Actually because of the fairly recent awareness of the depth of this problem, people are beginning to provide more shelters for these kids to protect them.
Yes. The girls and boys are broken. And that's why they think so little of themselves that they pose for pornography. It's all ugly, and NO one calling himself a conservative should be supporting it as harmless.