Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trappedincanuckistan
Nobody is talking about a man masturbating in public. States and communities have laws in this regard. What Santorum is talking about is the Federal Government regulating the internet.

Wrong Mr. Trapped. We're talking about obscenity laws. You told me that the only valid laws are laws concerning aggression, violence and contracts. To be clear do you think that local laws concerning public obscenity are valid and thus you must broaden your scope a bit?

Also, have you found a law yet that doesn't have somebody's morality at it's base?

And one other thing, are you a pro choice libertarian or a pro life libertarian?

222 posted on 03/17/2012 11:29:45 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

I do recognize the need for local laws regarding obscenity. Mr. Santorum is talking about the Federal Government regulating the internet. I should have said that laws primarily exist.....

Your attempt to open another avenue (abortion) to attack me me was pathetic. You wanted to change the discussion from Santorum’s position on internet regulation. I am pro life, and have stated so on many occasions.


230 posted on 03/17/2012 11:41:52 AM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson