Perfect example of what I mean by being intellectually dishonest. You dislike the idea of voting for Romney so you try to justify it by saying there is no difference.
Can you honestly say that '20% across the board tax cuts' sounds like 'make the rich pay their fair share'?
That 'fewer regulations' sounds like 'more power to the EPA'?
That 'Repeal Obamacare' sounds like 'enforce the mandate and the heck if you don't like it'?
That 'open up more drilling and approve the Keystone pipeline' sounds like 'we don't need the Keystone pipeline and let's invest in renewable energy'?
You can not like Romney all you want to, but even a simpleton can figure out that those phrases illustrated above don't mean the same thing as each other. Geez, I don't want to sit here and defend Romney, but wake up and smell the reality.
The point is his record contradicts his words. He’ll say whatever he must to get elected. When he had the chance, he instituted gov’t mandated healthcare, banned guns, and other intolerables. Record > rhetoric.