As I have said for years, Unless we have a legitimate, LEGAL, birth certificate, we can't even know who Obama’s LEGAL father is. For those who say that the birth certificate is moot because Obama’s father was a British subject, I say WHO IS OBAMA'S LEGAL FATHER? The sperm donor doesn't matter. Obama senior is his father? Really? Where is your PROOF? Because Obama SAYS SO? Sorry, not good enough.
Legitimate, ORIGINAL, birth documents (not newspaper birth announcements) FIRST, then and only then, can we PROVE whether he is a “Natural Born Citizen” or not.
If Obama’s REAL BC has another man listed as father other than BHO, Sr., then one way to smoke that document out would be to press the “British Subject” angle. If we could get a court to agree (I know, I know) then I bet that BC with the other father’s name on it materializes. Of course the resulting embarrassment would also mean that BHO might have to withdraw from the presidential election as it would mean his entire story has been a lie.
My point is that the NBC requirement is linked tactically toward getting the real BC out into the public domain.
“In response to these facts, the left will sometimes mount an argument for why Obama is, in fact, natural-born.”
Here’s a thought. Exhume his “father” and “mother” and take DNA samples. They do it for other “criminals” to prove their true identity.