Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Riodacat

I disagree (although there ia an exception that I will address).

Let’s look at the math in this. Most proportional States have certain rules about who gains delegates and in which way. For example, a lot of States have a rule that you must hit the 20% threshold in order to gain delegates, and you win bonus delegates by winning Congressional districts.

So let’s look at Alabama last night.

Last night:
Santorum 35% — 17 delegates
Gingrich 29% — 12 delegates
Romney 29% — 10 delegates

Now if Gingrich wasn’t in last night, we would like to assume that all of his votes would go to Santorum, but likely some would go to Romney. If as little as 12% of Gingrich’s vote total had gone to Romney, the results might have looked like:

Santorum 59% — 27 delegates
Romney 34% — 12 delegates

Now if you are hoping for Santorum to win the nomination, that is a better outcome. But the odds are very long that Santorum will win the nomination. If your goal, however, is to stalemate Romney and deny him the nomination, Gingrich dropping out would be a bad thing because it would allow Romney the chance to build more delegates.

Now, the exception is that I believe Gingrich should pull all efforts from any “winner take all” State and work behind the scenes to push Santorum forward. Texas and Illinois could both fall to Santorum if Gingrich would do that, and that would seriously hamper Romney.


19 posted on 03/14/2012 7:25:43 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Here's the diff:
Except for a very few exceptions (e.g. Mass), even those States which Mittens has won, he hardly ever got more than 35% - 40% of the vote.
Which means that the overwhelming majority of Republicans DO NOT WANT Mittens as their nominee.
He wins, because the conservative vote is split.
Conservatives have consistently won GT 50% of the vote.
If a single Conservative candidate were to consistently win GT 50% of the popular vote, that person would be the nominee (IMHO).
27 posted on 03/14/2012 7:40:04 AM PDT by Riodacat (And when all is said and done, there'll be a hell of a lot more said than done......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

Actually, many states such as both Alabama and Mississippi become winner takes all if a candidate can get above 50%. In your scenario, Santorum would have swept all 47 of Alabama’s delagates and Romney would have been blanked.

Furthermore, in my state of IL, people will vote for Newt if he is in the race. In a poll on Sunday by the Chicago Tribune, Mitt had 35%, Rick had 31% and Newt had 12%. Newt is still attracting votes here, and Newt is coming to Chicago today, so it is not hard to see why.


59 posted on 03/14/2012 11:58:26 AM PDT by LovedSinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson