To: skeeter
You're right, but to be fair, world oil is heavily subsidized by the American taxpayer. Remember an important use of the US navy is protecting the shipping lanes from pirates. Without generous funding from your neighbors, the distributors' costs for moving their products would be substantially higher - even in insurance premiums protecting against loss.
I'm pretty tired of the rest of the world transporting all manners of products around the globe with the satisfied assurance that the US taxpayer is protecting their investment. It's well past time that the US government began assessing other nations for the services of protecting their exports in transit.
75 posted on
03/13/2012 11:13:31 AM PDT by
Sgt_Schultze
(A half-truth is a complete lie)
To: Sgt_Schultze
You're right, but to be fair, world oil is heavily subsidized by the American taxpayer. Remember an important use of the US navy is protecting the shipping lanes from pirates. You mean the Navy hasn't gone solar and wind power yet?
They could mount lots of windmills on those big suckers! and do you realize how many solar cells they could glue onto those aircraft carrier decks?
< /sarc >
101 posted on
03/13/2012 3:06:32 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(“It’s easy to make phony promises you can’t keep.” - Obama, Feb23, 2012)
To: Sgt_Schultze
Without generous funding from your neighbors, the distributors' costs for moving their products would be substantially higher - even in insurance premiums protecting against loss. I'm pretty tired of the rest of the world transporting all manners of products around the globe with the satisfied assurance that the US taxpayer is protecting their investment. It's well past time that the US government began assessing other nations for the services of protecting their exports in transit. How about; it's well past time we stop doing it?
111 posted on
03/13/2012 3:30:53 PM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson