Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bog trotter

“Michigan has required an id for a while now. Just showed it when I voted in the primary.”

Many northern States do, Its us southern that are subjected to this lawless indignity “federal acts” applied to us and us alone. Equal footing is a myth they gave up on a very long time ago.

I am a Texan, and to Washington that makes me scientifically less entitled to self-government than you a Michigander. I suppose it don’t much matter because in either case If they don’t like what we choose they come in and impose their will. In the long run tether of us are free men nor free peoples we individuality & collectively(as States) are both slaves to Lincoln’s Empire.


128 posted on 03/12/2012 11:47:31 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: All

This whole issue isn’t as simple as it seems on the surface. The “preclearance” requirement in the Voting Rights Act (in Section 5) has a history of litigation in Texas.

Basic info:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965#Section_5_-_Preclearance

The 25-year extension of the preclearance procedure (by Pres. Bush and the Congress in 2006) was challenged in a lawsuit in 2009 in Texas, but the Supreme Court failed to declare preclearance unconstitutional.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Austin_Municipal_Utility_District_No._1_v._Holder


129 posted on 03/13/2012 12:15:52 AM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson