“Translation: O’Brien, having embarrassed herself in her interview with Pollack, brings on someone who makes their bread and butter with Critical Race Theory to defend Critical Race Theory and pretend O’Brien didn’t embarrass herself.
And I’m not speaking as a “Breitbart.com reader”; I’m speaking as a social scientist who’s been in academia for 25 years as a student and professor, one who’s actually taught about critical theory approaches to social science — though you can’t really call any critical theory approach a “science,” since they’re normative, not objective. Let me put it so simply that maybe even someone like O’Brien can understand: things like Critical Race Theory are considered a joke by pretty much any academic who make their living from it. It is the Al Sharpton of academia: a money making scam feeding off racial resentment that is tolerated only because paying them off is considered preferable to the alternative (the sort of building occupations, protests, threats, etc. in the sixties that resulted in these academic positions being created in the first place).”
AND—
The Wikipedia entry for Critical Race Theory “was edited 28 times that day After this exchange. The original talked specifically to white supremacy, and the edited version took it out completely. Before that day, the entry had been edited twice in the last year. Here is a link to the before and after version on Wiki..
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_race_theory&diff=480904326&oldid=474146737
Here is the link for the edits done right after Soledad made a fool of herself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_race_theory&action=history
It is hilarious how liberals will attempt to bend and shape the truth/reality to fit the narrative. They would make the Soviets proud. And the legions of useful idiots here in the US who are unquestionably compliant with the lie, would make them proud too.”
Wasn’t O’Brien the one who shared an “Obama bump” with some co-host recently? (No, I don’t mean a line of coke; rather, a fist bump which they called an “Obama bump.”
Very good find!
I have put it up where others can eee on my site today. Thanks.
Brings a vision to mind that I had reading 1984 a long time ago, men in visors typing and editing wordspeak. Did quite understand what the author was taking about at the time, but I do now.