Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shelterguy
"Rush did not slander anyone."

Courts decide such issues and as far as the FCC is concerned your opinion on the matter means zilcho.

Deal with the reality not what you "WISH" were the facts.

Further have you noticed now the argument has morphed from the First Amendment to Rush didn't do it. Sure sign the First Amendment issue is WRONG.

114 posted on 03/12/2012 5:36:14 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawgg

What do your buddies at DailyKos say about it?


115 posted on 03/12/2012 5:38:31 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: Mad Dawgg
Sorry, but unless Rush gets NO MONEY for being on armed forces radio, what Levin is trying to do to him most CERTAINLY IS a first amendment issue. That's someone in the government pushing FOR the government to take away someone's livelihood just because he doesn't like his opinion. Limbaugh has certainly not broken any rules or laws.

I'm with you on the boycott thing not being 1st amendment related, however, I do have a problem (maybe constitutional, still not sure) with the whole thing being led by the slime at Media Matters, which somehow, last I checked, is some kind of "non-profit" entity that pays no taxes.

117 posted on 03/12/2012 5:44:56 AM PDT by safeasthebanks ("The most rewarding part, was when he gave me my money!" - Dr. Nick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson