“Then I’ll be happy to discuss the less important matters you raise.”
The “candidate” dictates to voters what he will talk about?
The candidate will not describe his qualifications?
You are pissing into the wind, with an attitude like that.
No. You and I just disagree about what constitutes “qualifications.”
And besides, I’ve made myself available to any question anyone cares to ask twice a week for the last four years. That’s besides the dozen years of posting I’ve done here at FR.
Look, if you want formal degrees, I’m not your guy. Maybe you should consider Obama. He allegedly went to Hah-vard and Columbia. If you want business success, go with Willard. He buys and sells companies and souls and “conservative” organizations and political parties and delegates as a vocation.
But if you value rock-ribbed, no-nonsense, never-back-up, never-back-down, proven Reagan conservatism - pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-border security, pro-national sovereignty, Peace through Strength - more than those things, you might consider what we’re doing to restore principled government of the people, by the people and for the people.
Have a nice evening.
― G.K. Chesterton