Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Rick Santorum got a $2 million Virginia estate
washingtonexaminer.com ^ | mar.2012 | bySteve Contorno

Posted on 03/09/2012 11:05:29 AM PST by VU4G10

Rick Santorum built his presidential candidacy on the premise that he is very different than wealthy, establishment front-runner Mitt Romney, that he is someone who has faced the plights of the average American. Among the hardships Santorum claims to share is an underwater mortgage, the kind that's forcing millions from their homes.

"The value of my house is a fraction of what it was when I bought it," the former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania recently told Michigan supporters.

But the Republican presidential contender's housing situation is quite unlike the one so many other Americans actually face, according to experts and documents obtained by The Washington Examiner.

Santorum bought his $2 million, five-acre home in the tony Washington suburb of Great Falls, Va., in August 2007 through a trust in a deal aided by a high-profile tax lawyer who serves as an officer for one of the largest homebuilders in the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: dcinsider; emptyvest; fairfaxcounty; idontcare; insidersantorum; lobbyistrick; millionaires; santorum; santorumhome; santorumhouse; santorumlies; va2012; wedontcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last
To: netmilsmom
I voted for him twice so don't go there.

His in-laws lived next door and when he visited PA he and his family stayed with his in-laws. If you read the reports at the time, the house wasn't even furnished.

He did not live there, even part time.

I'm sure they could have worked it into a campaign contribution like they did from Accu-weather.

121 posted on 03/09/2012 7:01:42 PM PST by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

No, it’s not “Nuff said”. who do you think you are, Sanctimonium? you decide what’s right and wrong for everybody? Open your eyes, open your mind, face the facts.


122 posted on 03/09/2012 7:05:13 PM PST by true believer forever (If Newt is good enough for Sarah, he's good enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Abby4116

Oh for heaven’s sake, if it wasn’t Rick Santorum no one would have cared.

He owned the house, he paid the taxes.

Conservatives DON’T care.


123 posted on 03/09/2012 7:12:24 PM PST by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

In 1996 Santorum was supporting the Presidential run of Specter, running on a platform to make the GOP a pro-abortion party, because in 2005 He would be Chair of the Judicial Committee?

Actually Senator Santorum would have known him as the man who stopped Bork. That was done during the Reagan presidency, when Santorum was anti-Reagan, and considered Reagan supporters as “fringe”.

“His opposition to Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork in 1987 is seen as an important factor in the nomination’s failure.”


124 posted on 03/09/2012 7:16:17 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Oh for Heaven’s Sake, calm down.

‘Nuff said as in “Bu-bye”

In other words, the conversation has gone no where. If you would like to act irrationally, be my guess. Jump up and down like Yosemite Sam, for all I care. Continue the conversation, but it’s one sided.

Have a nice day.


125 posted on 03/09/2012 7:19:00 PM PST by netmilsmom (I am Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Evidently you are ignoring post 115. This was a Presidential race, not a Senate race.

Here is video of Senator Santorum on stage with Arlen Specter, as Specter is announcing his Presidential run, based on making the GOP a pro-abortion party, Rick Santorum endorsed him, and campaigned for him.

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/64281-1


126 posted on 03/09/2012 7:20:27 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: livius

>> He shouldn’t whine about it and pretend he’s one step away from foreclosure, though.

It does matter especially since he paints himself as the impecunious candidate.

This is a surprising revelation.


127 posted on 03/09/2012 7:24:13 PM PST by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Yes, I listed to it but he was still at the time an influential member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

But here are Santorum’s ratings when he was in Congress.

American Conservative Union — 88%

National Right to Life Committee — 100%

Americans for Tax Reform — 95%

National Tax Limitation Committee — 92%

U.S. Chamber of Commerce — 88%

League of Private Property Voters — 94%

http://www.redstate.com/wosg/2012/01/06/rick-santorum-yes-he-is-a-true-conservative/


128 posted on 03/09/2012 7:43:07 PM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Trying to make the Republican party a pro-abortion party is a disgrace, Santorum backers need to explain it.

I’m officially endorsing Newt Gingrich for President today
Jan 19, 2012 | Jim Robinson, Free Republic

I’m officially endorsing Newt Gingrich for president today. Was going to wait until after Florida, but see no reason to delay. We need Newt to win in South Carolina and Florida to stop any possible momentum building up for the establishment big government, statist, abortionist RINO!!

RomneyCare = ObamaCare = government tyranny!! Taxpayer funded abortion is as evil as evil can be!!

Newt is a pro-life Reagan Revolution conservative who led the Republican Revolution of the 90’s, taking the majority away from the democrats who had held it for 40 years. And as Speaker, cut the taxes, cut the government, cut the spending, cut the deficit, cut regulations, cut unemployment, brought the federal budget under control for four years running. And unlike Romney, actually blocked a socialist healthcare system from becoming law. And created a pro-growth, pro-free market, pro-jobs environment and extended the Reagan economy throughout the 90’s!! Newt is the ideal candidate to lead the Tea Party Revolution!!


129 posted on 03/09/2012 7:50:56 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

I didn’t - and don’t have anything else to say to you... You don’t tell me when to end my conversations, was my point. you might want to work on your snarky tone... it’s not too attractive.


130 posted on 03/09/2012 7:59:17 PM PST by true believer forever (If Newt is good enough for Sarah, he's good enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: GracieOMalley

and what sate is that?


131 posted on 03/10/2012 11:07:42 AM PST by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: GracieOMalley

and what state is that?


132 posted on 03/10/2012 11:07:55 AM PST by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson