Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: darth

——Any conservationist should welcome an activity that produces fuel with no CO2 emissions and provides cheap energy while reducing the amount of nuclear waste to near zero.-——

At a previous job, a hardline Brookline MA liberal told me she regretted protesting Seabrook, and now supports nuclear power.

I almost keeled over.


19 posted on 03/08/2012 5:39:57 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

Unfortunetly, I am with her , not because I fear nuclear power , but because it is too costly. We on PSNH in NH have the highest electric rates in the country. We wouild have been much better off buying power from Quebec Hydro than ever building Seabrook. It would have been much cheaper.

Also, we have plenty of wood waste in the state to fuel several more biomass fired wood boiler turbines.

What we need is more pipeline capacity to get the natural gas from NY, PA and OH up here to reduce our dependence on home heating oil and propane to heat our homes.


22 posted on 03/08/2012 6:33:02 AM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson