So your opinion is unchanged by the article? Do you think it’s all lies?
I was talking with my husband about it and he said he felt there are glimmers of truth somewhere in the story. For me I know that I never watch Good Morning America and to say they broke the story on Rev. Wright I find laughable.
From the story:
“Breitbart never really knew why Drudge took this obvious pro-Obama position (interestingly, he told me they had only spoken twice in the approximately ten years he had help run the site at that point). He theorized that perhaps Drudge had become too “Europeanized,” but I personally concluded that Drudge simply knew that having Obama around would be fantastic for business. Breitbart never wanted to divulge any of this publicly out of respect for (and fear of) of Drudge, but the Andrew I knew would have wanted people to know about this after he was gone.”
Mr. Zigler personally concluded -which means it is his opinion and Andrew is not here to challenge it. Mr. Zigler also stated “Breitbart never wanted to divulge any of this publicly out of respect for (and fear of) of Drudge,—and goes on to say that Andrew would have wanted people to know this after he was gone—how do we know that except for Mr. Ziglers words.
I find the story and timing odd and honestly I feel like I am living in alternate universe and it is getting stranger
everyday.