Re BHO’s teaching style and substance
Excerpt:
First up, John C. Eastman, Dean and Donald P. Kennedy Chair in Law at Chapman University and a former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas:
My one criticism of the course is his recommendation that students read Derrick Bells summary of some landmark (if notorious) Supreme Court decisions. Cases such as Dred Scott v. Sanford, The Slaughterhouse Cases, and Plessy v. Ferguson, and in particular the strong dissenting opinions in those cases, cry out for careful study of the original materials, not a secondary summary.
Only occasionally do then-Professor Obamas decidedly personal views come across. He refers to Justice Scalias approach to assessing fundamental rights as cramped, for example. But on the whole, this is a body of course materials that is as would be expected of Chicago Law Professors.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/inside-professor-obamas-classroom/