To: Texan5; reed13k
It's "de ja vue" all over again; this was tried in the 70's - as you say - using Joe Namath as their spokesman. Joe appeared on TV wearing those things. Back then they were "Mannyhose", as opposed to "ManTyhose".
It was a major dud then, and probably will be now, even if we do have more metrosexual candidates in today's society...huh, obama?
18 posted on
03/07/2012 9:24:19 AM PST by
FrankR
(You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
To: FrankR; reed13k
One night when we were watching TV and the commercial came on, our then-6 year old daughter asked my husband “daddy will you wear that?” Daddy, an engineer said scornfully “no, baby-real daddys don’t wear that.” That is still true...
And let’s not forget the other Carter era stuff we have been forced to re-visit-home thermostasts turned down to freezing and wearing coats in the house because of the cost of electricity, heating oil and propane, eating ground beef as a treat instead of the better cuts of beef, and counting the change from everyone’s pockets to buy an extra gallon of gas-like that worked out so well the first time.
And coming soon, at this rate-the joy and camaraderie of waiting in line at the local gas station, hoping there is still going to be gas left for you to buy...
24 posted on
03/07/2012 9:45:03 AM PST by
Texan5
("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
To: FrankR
Pantyhose aren't underwear. I believe they are considered lingerie,as well as leg wear.
79 posted on
03/07/2012 6:08:05 PM PST by
POWERSBOOTHEFAN
(I love you,Pumpkin. You are the best cat in the world. You're my Sweet Pea.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson