Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Gene Eric
Of course much depends on the timing of the strike but I am betting that Obama is calculating a rally – round-the-flag effect which has occurred with out exception every time the Commander-In-Chief engages in military action. That support will certainly fade as it did for example for George W. Bush in Iraq as things go poorly over time.

But a strike by Obama six weeks or four weeks before the election could have a devastating effect on Republicans' chances.

You ask how would Obama be benefited by $7-$10 a gallon gasoline? Because the memory of $6 a gallon gasoline would be swept away. Because Iran would be the villain and all would be blamed, not on Obama, but on the Ayatollah.

Any severe recession/depression which ensues as a result of skyhigh petroleum costs would not be incurred until after the election.

Incidentally, my complaint about Dershowitz and William Kristol is that they are shaping the debate so that we are utterly vulnerable to such an October Surprise. They will not tolerate any objections raised now to a potential strike because they count the elimination of a bomb in Iran as more important than winning the election. That is certainly true of Dershowitz. Therefore, they see any warnings about an October surprise as being harmful to their ultimate cause of getting a strike against Iran.

They seek to shut down the debate. They will give Obama the running room on this at the cost of the election so long as they get their strike.

Considered from a purely political point of view, our best outcome would be a successful strike by Israel so that Obama gets no credit.


15 posted on 03/07/2012 1:15:51 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

Speaking of Israel, it shouldn’t surprise anyone that Obama is now best-buds with Bibi.


17 posted on 03/07/2012 1:42:57 AM PST by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
While I agree with your assessment, I do not believe Israel will wait for the jug-eared skid mark's approval. Instead, I see Israel taking the initiative and completely wiping out all of the Iranian reactors without providing the pResident any warning whatsoever. I believe Bibi to be astute enough that the current reside of the White House is at best indifferent to the plight or even survival of the Israeli people, and at worst an active participant/enabler of their destruction. The O-hole should receive all of the credit he deserves in ridding the world of the Iranian nuclear threat, which happens to be the same number of benefits Americans have realized since his “ascension”... ZERO.
27 posted on 03/07/2012 4:56:14 AM PST by Common Sense 101 (Hey libs... If your theories fly in the face of reality, it's not reality that's wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson