Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx

The reason any rivals campaigned there is because Gingrich was somewhat weak there in the first place. They didn’t bother with Massachusetts and I’m sure no one is going to bother a whole lot with Pennsylvania.

I’m baffled by what is “embarrassing” and “not embarrassing.”

In my world, 47% of the vote in the state you represented in Congress for 20 years is kind of embarrassing.

I also think having seven different caucuses and primaries with single digit vote percentages is pretty embarrassing (I’m only counting the ones where Newt was actually on the ballot.)


1,277 posted on 03/06/2012 10:04:39 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1270 | View Replies ]


To: Strategerist

Not as embarrassing as losing a senatorial seat by 18 points in a state that knows you best.

Cindie


1,288 posted on 03/06/2012 10:58:13 PM PST by gardencatz (I'm lucky enough to live, walk & breathe among heroes! I am the mother of a US Marine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1277 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson