Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Girlene

Always the last few votes for Mitt. Shouldn’t percentages be more consistent? If one candidate is pretty much cleaning up right through 80%, wouldn’t you think they’d at least survive the last 20%?


1,124 posted on 03/06/2012 8:32:33 PM PST by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1114 | View Replies ]


To: Kenny

I think it’s the precincts that are reporting. The latest coming in are in Romney strongholds I guess.

Romney’s lead is growing for now:
423,680 417,821
38% 37%
91% Reporting


1,133 posted on 03/06/2012 8:35:20 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1124 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny

And why do they call states for mitt with 1% of the votes, but not if then other guy is ahead, until mitt finds the few votes he needs at the end.


1,146 posted on 03/06/2012 8:37:53 PM PST by Yaelle (Santorums 2012 - we need a STEADY conservative President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1124 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny

Always the last few votes for Mitt. Shouldn’t percentages be more consistent? If one candidate is pretty much cleaning up right through 80%, wouldn’t you think they’d at least survive the last 20%?

***

Yes, hmmm, always seems to happen this way with old Mittie. He somehow always “finds” those votes at the end, long after most have gotten bored and gone to bed.

And whoever did vote for Newt in Ohio ...now was NOT the time, folks — pull your heads out of your BACKSIDES.

I’m s Newt supporter, but I’m not stupid.


1,147 posted on 03/06/2012 8:39:21 PM PST by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson