President Obama: ‘I don’t know what’s in Rush Limbaugh’s heart’

Yahoo! News ^ | March 6, 2012 | Olivier Knox

[Free ThinkerNY]

At his first solo press conference of 2012, President Barack Obama addressed the controversy over Rush Limbaugh's insulting of Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown law student who testified before Congress to advocate for free access to contraception.

"I don't know what's in Rush Limbaugh's heart, so I'm not going to comment on the sincerity of his apology," Obama said.

He added, "All decent folks can agree that the remarks that are made don't have any place in the public discourse," and said his phone call to Fluke, a Georgetown law student, was driven by his feelings for his daughters.

[Publius6961]

It's embarrassing for the president of the United States to become a central figure in a childish radical social conspiracy. Wishing to define the dialog, he wishes that at least his constituency will neglect the facts :

There are dozens of Soros and other liberal funding source activists constantly working to destroy the moral state of the country, to make it easier for activist socialist reformers to get a grip on everything.

Some of these funded groups arranged to inflitrate Christian Universities in the cause of the GLBT groups, the pointy end of the decadence spear.
One group funded a series of "scholarships" for a promising "student" whose entire academic training consists of radical creatively useless courses and diplomas of no actual use to society.
This student then chose a Catholic University which generally had traditional moral standards, ready to be attacked and eliminated. She knew that the important issues of the GLBT community had no traction there. Georgetown University is high profile, being in DC made it perfect, close to all the government muscle and lobbyists to aid and abet her plan.

She then attempted to insinuate herself into the Obama plan congressional debate --- unsuccessfuly.
She then arranged to be "invited" by the GLBT supporters in Congress to discuss "femanine health issues" before congress, knowing that any opposition would derail the hearings on the constitutionality of Obamacare or the principle that any pressure group can "create" a new right and have it validated by "Congresional hearing," like, say, recreational sex.

Recreationa sex can be a negative health issue, but it's a personal lifestyle choice, indistinguishable from cocaine addiction, also a negative "health issue."

This new "right" would then be supported by the American working taxpayer (another item of "fairness.")

And here we are... arguing about a self-defined slut, instead of the over the cliff federal spending and the constitutionality of Obamacare.

[bgill]

I know exactly what’s in Hussein’s empty cavity.

[Publius6961]

The best thing is to just laugh at the Mau-Mauing. The Left hates that.

Another way to say it is, "Ignore the gorilla suit."
There was a Freeper thread with a similar name in the last few months.

[Publius6961]

Isn't that Sarkozy on the right?
Hard to tell which is whose "mentor..."

[buck61]

Good grief! Now it is O.K. to use his children? good citizens...just the commie way!

Wouldn’t think he would want to put his children in the spot light, but after all, it is Obama. And, when people start using them in the press, I don’t want to hear a da*n thing from this sack of excrement.

[altura]

Has he sent Bill Maher’s million bux back yet?

Guess his daughters don’t mind conservative women being called nasty names.

[Pietro]

This is about forcing the Catholic Church to pay for abortions—nothing less.

[sheik yerbouty]

We know what’s in 0bama’s..

[Gene Eric]

>> “I don’t know what’s in Rush Limbaugh’s heart, so I’m not going to comment on the sincerity of his apology,” Obama said.

So, what’s in that three page letter to Karzai concerning the apology over the book burnings?

[cynwoody]

Looking at that photo, I think Monsieur le Président gets all there is to be got.