Good afternoon n’@!
Ok...don’t flame me...but Drudge has a linky up—Fluke also supports insurance payments of transgender surgery. She is soooo very far left. She wants not only the surgery, but the follow up cosmetic procedures, the hormone therapy...counseling, etc. She even went on tour and “spoke” at Berkeley. Yeah...random student...
And might i add one little thing in this Fluke mess. Who, in her personal life, has come to her aid or defense? What of the womyn with the worried faces on the Georgetown Campus? What about her significant other(s)? Just like Barry...she has NO real history. Why is BC such an issue in her life? Hmmmm?
Wow. Rush had it all wrong...
http://www.ehow.com/about_5436149_definition-fluke.html
No one’s going to dig into her personal life any time soon. Libs cover for eachother. They send 30 reporters to root through Sarah Palin’s garbage, but they don’t even bother to verify Sandra Fluke’s age.
I’m tired of hearing about her. I wish Sandra would just go Fluke herself.
BTW, were you listening to 104.7 last night? In lieu of Savage’s first 45 minutes, they replayed Rush’s monologue from yesterday.
She suggested yesterday that folks go read Media Matters .... they had a ‘really good story’ .....
That reference alone tags her as a Major Lefty.
BTW, Fluck should hook up with Obama’s transgender nanny - they could do some campaign commercials together.
LOL - there’s nothing in your post to flame. But you may have swerved into something. What about all her feminine friends who have benefited from BC? But more importantly, what about all the men who are now grateful to God that they didn’t get her pregnant? Shouldn’t they be contacted as being supportive of BC also?
About that high cost of BC in Fluke’s statement.
“This mandate is not really about condoms or generic versions of ‘the pill,’ which are available free or cheap in lots of places. This is about brand-name birth control drugs and other devices that some consumers swear off because they are too expensive. The Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate requires health-insurance companies provide contraceptive coverage for all ‘FDA approved contraceptive methods.’ It does not insist on generics. And it does not offer any cost containment.
What’s more, the mandate prevents health-insurance companies from having copays or deductibles for the benefit. This is the perfect set up for Big Pharma. Since the drugs will be paid for by a third party (insurance companies, who will pass the cost on to employers and the rest of us), the consumer won’t worry about the price. It’s important to point out that among President Obama’s biggest financial backers are precisely the Big Pharma companies who benefit from the mandate. Sally Sussman, head of government affairs for Pfizer, is one of his biggest campaign bundlers, who co-hosted a fundraiser for Obama on Thursday night. Pfizer sells numerous contraceptives that now must be covered by health-care plans. Obama’s financial ties to the pharmaceutical...
As Tim Carney of the Washington Examiner pointed out last year, since the Obama administration took office, “the drug industry’s $635 million in lobbying exceeds that of Wall Street and the oil and gas industry, combined.” Peter Schweizer: Big Pharma’s Role in the Contraception Debate. Via TDB of all places.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/02/peter-schweizer-big-pharma-s-role-in-the-contraception-debate.html
I read about that last nite.
It would be extremely interesting to investigate her homelife; i.e. childhood, parents, residential area that she grew up. Who the hell spawned this creature??