I do see the logic you are following even though no one else seems to be concerned. In fact, the L.A. Times said they will publish the post as a letter. Probably use of the word “facetious” in the last paragraph helps. Anyway if I post it again I will use:
“Ms. Fluke’s testimony connotes that 40% of the women in law school consider sexual intercourse a compelling or preferred recreational activity.”
Okay, RM, now I understand. I'll wager that some people read your post and believed what you wrote because (a) they're pre-dispossessed to believe the worst about Fluke and Georgetown coeds, and (b) Rush Limbaugh did what you did on a lesser scale, but he's believable and he did it repeatedly for two days, so he prepared them for your statement about her testimony.