Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
To: SeekAndFind
It’s hard to watch this without puking:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/03/05/sandra_fluke_praises_media_matters_on_the_view.html
I just hate the way greasy liberals phrase things:
She said ...women who have been UNABLE TO ACCESS contraceptives as a result of the lack of insurance coverage...
UNABLE TO ACCESS??? WTF^2??
I think she should be saying “too cheap to buy” (they have costly iPhone plans no doubt, but cant access contraceptives)? Give me a break, libtard.
She’s presenting this as if some bogeyman/strawman is blocking her so-called “access” to contraceptives. What a slick sales job these liberals do.
“ACCESS” is such a cowardly liberal code word for entitlement accessories that someone else “should” pay for.
Greedy liberals at it again..
78 posted on
03/05/2012 4:41:28 PM PST by
AlanGreenSpam
(Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
To: SeekAndFind
79 posted on
03/05/2012 4:45:16 PM PST by
AlanGreenSpam
(Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
To: SeekAndFind
rush should have never apologized. he makes millions he doesn;t need to keep some crappy flower delivery sponsor
all it takes for evil to thrive is for good men to do nothing (or apologize even when they’re right)
82 posted on
03/05/2012 6:16:58 PM PST by
Cubs Fan
(The biggest, most pernicious greed of all -- government greed)
To: SeekAndFind
rush should have never apologized. he makes millions he doesn;t need to keep some crappy flower delivery sponsor
all it takes for evil to thrive is for good men to do nothing (or apologize even when they’re right)
83 posted on
03/05/2012 6:17:06 PM PST by
Cubs Fan
(The biggest, most pernicious greed of all -- government greed)
To: SeekAndFind
rush should have never apologized. he makes millions he doesn;t need to keep some crappy flower delivery sponsor
all it takes for evil to thrive is for good men to do nothing (or apologize even when they’re right)
84 posted on
03/05/2012 6:17:06 PM PST by
Cubs Fan
(The biggest, most pernicious greed of all -- government greed)
To: SeekAndFind
1. Strong relationships and honorable disagreements do not require appologies.
2. The View not long ago promoted calling each other sluts on the View, so, what gives? Why all of a sudden this retraction by the View? Or is it that they want us to be guilty for their reasons?
86 posted on
03/05/2012 6:27:10 PM PST by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
To: SeekAndFind
[[Sandra Fluke on The View: Rushs apology changes nothing]]
Rush, on the Rush Limbaugh Show “I don’t care if the slut accepts the apology or not- it’s there if she ever decides to accept it”
88 posted on
03/05/2012 6:36:16 PM PST by
CottShop
(Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
To: SeekAndFind
In my opinion Rush should have aologized- only his apology should have read
“I apologize to fluke, I called her a slut, and after having time to think about it, it was an insult to sluts the world over to call her a slut- I didn’;t mean to insult sluts the world over, and hope they will forgive me for insulting them. As for fluke- I couldn’t give a fluke what she thinks of my previous comment”
91 posted on
03/05/2012 6:54:44 PM PST by
CottShop
(Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
To: SeekAndFind
Of course the slut won’t accept it. The whore is going to milk this forever. Has she called Hollywood yet about them making a movie about her?
To: SeekAndFind
Well, if his apology is meaningless, why not take his original comments in the same manner and consider them meaningless as well?
96 posted on
03/05/2012 8:28:21 PM PST by
metmom
(For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
To: SeekAndFind
I dont think that a statement like this issued, saying that his choice of words was not the best, changes anything, and especially when that statement is issued when hes under significant pressure from his sponsors who have begun to pull their support, said the 30-year-old student, Sandra Fluke.Oh, so does that mean we'll no longer hear calls for boycotts every time somebody does something a lib doesn't like, since what people do while they're losing sponsors doesn't count after all?
98 posted on
03/05/2012 10:25:57 PM PST by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: SeekAndFind
From FOX News:
The rush to censor Limbaugh
So why are the Left and the media still pushing and publicizing a campaign for advertisers to dump the Limbaugh show and end his career?
Because it has little to do with his words. This is all about disingenuous politics. Liberals want this government-mandate controversy to be not about religious liberty, which is devastating, but about contraceptives, which works in their favor.
That is intellectually dishonest.
They want to position conservatives as anti-women. Thats as ugly as it is untrue.
Everyone remembers Ed Schultz calling Laura Ingraham a slut on his radio show.
Fellow talk show host Mike Malloy hoped Sarah Palin drives herself into madness and insisted Michele Bachmann is an evil bitch from Hell who would have gladly supervised the Holocaust.
Montel Williams rooted on Air America for Bachmann to slit her own wrist or throat.
Randi Rhodes insisted that teenage boys werent safe from Palins advances if they stayed over at her house. Theres no news coverage or war on women narrative when the mud-covered women are conservatives.
Maybe these hosts arent prominent enough?
Then consider the case study of Bill Maher, whos welcomed all over TV news shows.
A year ago on his HBO show, he called Sarah Palin a dumb twat.
He followed up days later in a Dallas stand-up routine by calling Palin the C-word.
Last July on HBO, he said Palin was a bully who sells patriotism like a pimp, and the leader of a strange family of inbred weirdos.
Last September on his show, Maher said Palin would have sex with Rick Perry if he was black.
Days after he called Palin the T-word, he appeared with then-CNN host Eliot Spitzer, where Spitzer concluded, Your show is brilliant. I love watching it.
On Sunday, Democratic Party chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz huffed on Meet the Press that "I don't know any woman in America that thinks that being called a slut is funny." But two months ago, she accepted an invitation to sit on the set with the man who called Palin a c---.
A couple of years ago, comedian Louis CK joked on the Opie and Anthony radio show about Palin coming to the Republican convention holding a baby that just came out of her f-ing, disgusting [C-word], her f-ing retard-making [C-word]. I hate her more than anybody, he said.
On Twitter, this comedian attacked Palin in 2011 as a fing jackoff [C-word]-face jazzy wondergirl who has a family of Chinese poor people living in her [C-word] hole.
Guess which event this same fellow is headlining in June? -- The Radio and Television Correspondents Dinner.
WHERE'S THE OUTRAGE?!?!?
99 posted on
03/06/2012 3:42:01 AM PST by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: SeekAndFind
> Sandra Fluke : Rushs apology changes nothing
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
I agree with her.
Which is why you must *NEVER*, *EVER* apologize to the Left.
Like Moslems, they see it as weakness. Like sharks, it is blood in the water to them.
106 posted on
03/06/2012 7:14:12 AM PST by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson