This forger picked the absolute worst method possible to forge a document, by cutting and pasting different elements from other documents and layering them to create a Frankenstein birth certificate. This somehow makes sense to you when the corrupt Hawaiian officials could have simply forged a new... perfect... document.
You're saying Obama hired the Orly Taitz of forgers?
OkeeDokee.
You’re saying Obama hired the Orly Taitz of forgers?
What is he supposed to do put an ad in the New York times for an accomplished BC forger? Obama is incompetent at everything he does, what makes you think he would know a good forger from a bad one? The forger probably came to him from a small group of loyalists and offered his services. Maybe the forger intentionally made massive errors to expose the fraud...held back copies and info and after the doc came out as a fraud advised Obama if anything happened to him proof would go to all the right wing conservatives , Arpaio etc and nail Obama...Talk about a forger being able to blackmail Obama...the forger would have to hold back evidence to protect himself, and why not do a little blackmail while he was at it? You need to watch more TV.
Need to narrow it down to Hawaii or not Hawaii and go from there.
A PURPOSEFUL forgery. For the SSkeptic, it is all about protecting institutions by any means necessary. The Obama Birth Certificate is one such serious example and form of a Fake-Hoax, albeit slightly different in its logic from the Strange Sounds video issue. A copy of the birth certificate with 17 or more OBVIOUS evidences of inconsistency/apparent adjustments was released to the public last year. The layer tampering was so obvious, that to the reasonable public mind, surely anyone seeking to release a fake birth certificate would never commit such errors. A presumption is therefore foisted by the SSkeptic Cabal, that the errors must have been committed at the originating Hawaii offices back from 1961, and whether fraud or not, therefore a more legitimate birth certificate cannot be located. In this brilliant strategy, the fake-hoax version of the birth certificate exonerates the publishers of the certificate from any crime, as they would be stupid to release such a fake, were they indeed ill-intentioned – and we, the victims are left fully unable to ascertain the truth in the matter. Take as Deskeption closure this ‘fall right in line’ statement by Nathan Goulding in the National Register Online from April 27, 2011, concerning the certificate
“What’s not plausible is that the government spent all this time manufacturing Obama’s birth certificate only to commit the laughably rookie mistake of exporting the layers (with the apparent errors)… Let’s leave it at that.”
Move along folks, nothing to see here.
– Deskeptor
http://deskeption.wordpress.com/tag/debunked-videos/
What makes you think that the 1961 typewriter still exists ..or that a similar one could be found? ..or that those forms still exist in that exact match. How do propose to insert it in the existing microfilm roll or if film to make a duplicate, but alternate, roll is still made? The forger probably had to do it electronically.
As absurd as it seems, I believe that yes, obummer was in fact limited in his forgery resources. You can’t just farm out a top secret project like that, without putting yourself at risk. Plus, the number of people willing to risk prison (and possible treason charges?) narrows the pool considerably.
I’m guessing bark had to ask someone in the inner circle to make the doc. Knowing he could count on most of the media to ignore it anyway, and threatening (breitbarting) the ones who refused.
You can stick your head back up your colon now.