Posted on 03/04/2012 2:50:54 AM PST by Kaslin
“First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.” - - Mahatma Gandhi
If Perot was in the 92 election for a vendetta against Bush,
why was he in the 96 election?
Bookmarked for later read..
Who is Kam Kuwata?
You'll have to ask him.
The fact that he had a different motivation in '96, or that he had more than one reason to run for President doesn't take away from his well known hatred for the Bush Family in general, and George (Sr.) in particular.
If you read the entire article you'll see their relationship started in the 70's when Bush turned down Perot's job offer.
But they've kissed and made up since Perot endorsed W in 2000.
there is “tension” between the Feinstein and Obama camps.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/04/12/112016/death-of-political-consultant.html
A congressman, David Schweikert (R-AZ 5th District), gave a short interview the other night on a local station and said that the investigation is just noise and we should be focusing on the election in Nov. Don't look to congress to be courageous.
Sheriff Arpaio maybe like a good poker player.
He may not being playing all his cards just yet.
BTTT
The real shame is the process didn’t START with this type of investigation, it would have gotten substantially more traction.
More than a lone con man, he acts more like he’s the subject of mind-control experimentation. His handlers are close by, and he’s the vessel to push their agenda out through speeches and executive actions. His whole history and persona is a con job. His whole “presidency” is a con job.
Perot hated Bush so much he was in the 92 election to keep him from being reelected, but he didn't hate him so much that he got into the 88 election to keep him from being elected in the first place. Then he was in the 96 election for some unknown reason.
Got it. If that makes sense to you more power to you.
As far as myself I've got better sense.
I hear that all the future Monopoly games will have a new card, its the Presidents card.
Cannot be arrested, does not pay rent, can pass Go as often as possible and can vacation on any of your properties rent free.
Can a non-immigrant resident alien become president?
If he naturalized after college,
Can a naturalized citizen become president?
Information from college up to right before becoming state senator is what will get him in hot water, eligibility wise.
Fake birthcertificate and selective service registration are the ‘pot’ as it were....
Move the last comma to after ‘obama’.
(Eats shoots and leaves :D )
“Even after all is said and done, I do not believe anything will happen to BHO!”...I disagree: After all is said and done, something seriously unfortunate is going to happen to this anti-American terrorist sympathizer.
[Obama turned 18 during the window (1975-1980) when males were not required to register. If he was in the United States then, he would remember that. I don’t know why he would fake a registration now. That seems like a stupid slip up by his campaign bent on covering his tracks.]
Not true:
On July 2, 1980, however, President Carter signed Proclamation 4771, Registration Under the Military Selective Service Act, retroactively re-establishing the Selective Service registration requirement for all 1826 year old male citizens born on or after January 1, 1960. Only men born between March 29, 1957, and December 31, 1959, were completely exempt from Selective Service registration. The first registrations after Proclamation 4771 took place on Monday, July 21, 1980, for those men born in January, February and March 1960 at U.S. Post Offices. Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays were reserved for men born in the later quarters of the year, and registration for men born in 1961 began the following week.
I knew Øbama had to register because I had just missed the cutoff by four months.
Little barry dunham’s registration was faked because to run in the ILL races required SS registration compliance at the proper time.
I’m sure it was but even so they [his handlers] knew he would have a problem at a later date if he never registered.
Well, yes, but it’s still an awful sentence and should be reworked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.