Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Twinkie

I think you are missing the forest for the trees.

Read what she actually said.

I’m quite sure that S&P probably said to him: You are slandering her because there is nothing in her testimony before Congress that specifies what her actual sexual behavior is, and you have to retract.

I don’t blame him for having to do this. I think he was sloppy from the start. He’s just have to clean up the mess now.


456 posted on 03/03/2012 5:24:17 PM PST by sauropod (You can elect your very own tyranny - Marc Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies ]


To: sauropod

Yep. Me and forests and trees get confused.

I think Rush actually planned that last week to dramatize how hypocritical the left is. Obama calls Rush “reprehensible” for the Fluke incident; but is mute and muzzled about Maher’s comments about Sarah Palin. Rush is NOT running for office, nor does he have any power in the Republican Party. He’s just a private citizen (theoretically), and Obama and crew choose to attack him.

Rush’s comments today were absolutely genius; and his pronunciation of Sandra Fluke’s last name throughout was just inspired. Obama’s like Bill Clinton, who thought he wanted a piece of Rush; but got his fingers scorched every time he tangled with El Rushbo.


739 posted on 03/05/2012 4:33:21 PM PST by Twinkie (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson