Will Sandra Fluke sue Rush Limbaugh for calling her ‘a slut’? (Does she have a case?)

Christian Science Monitor ^ | 03/03/2012 | By Brad Knickerbocker, Staff writer

[airedale]

Didn’t she make herself a limited purpose public figure by testifying? She was also testifying about sex which means she can’t use that her sex life wasn’t discussed (it wasn’t directly). That means the bar is very very high. He’ll invoke New York Times vs. Sullilvan. Of course if the courts hold that New York Times vs Sullivan is no longer valid God help the media and the entertainment industrywhen all the conservatives who’ve been smeared go after not only the media but the actors, directors, writers etc of things like Game Change.

[A'elian' nation]

Rush should have played it a bit more cleverly and just called her Floosie Flookie.

Same meaning just less of an edge.

Wonder how this apology affects his Sullivan ratings?

At least he won’t have to read Carbonite commercials like they were actual news. Rush is a lot of things, but he is no Paul Harvey.

[grey_whiskers]

[grey_whiskers]

I think Select Comfort should change the name of their matress to Select-a-Slut.

How about just pronouncing only the first syllable of Comfort?

Cheers!

[chris37]

hehe oi oi, that would work equally as well, I must say :D