Here is a link to her testimony. Care to point out where she "spoke about how active her tw@t is"?
She did get in front of a micro-phone. Surprised she didn't go down on that too.
You’re really grasping at straws. If a 400 pound slob starts ranting about how food is too expensive and is costing him too much, he doesn’t need to explicitly talk about how much he eats for the audience to infer - correctly - that he eats way too much.
Similarly, if this unattractive woman will go in front of Congress to talk about how she spends $3 a day on contraception, the audience can correctly infer that she is quite sexually active. Birth control pills are about 30 cents a day. Condoms average about 50 cents a piece on Amazon. Even if she’s doubling up, she’s having sex an average of more than five times a day. Do the math. It’s not hard.
And just as we students have faced financial, emotional, and medical burdens as a result,
“We are all grateful for the new regulation that will meet the critical health care needs of so many women.
Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary.
She adds herself to the debate, she makes herself part of the argument. You can play word games but at the end of the day, she's still a slut.