[Vaquero]

they posted a question. it was voluntary.

in a political website, when a question is posed, you can answer, or not answer.

but answering that you wont answer is irrelevant to the question asked. so why do that except to just be contrary of the sake of being contrary..

I'm no moderator...could care less....so go ahead and be contrary.

ENJOY!

[Bigh4u2]

So what you are saying is that you just want to set the rules for everyone else? Right?

You don’t care for ‘non answers’ to questions, so they should just be banned! Correct?

I see.

“ENJOY!”

Thanks.. I will.