Replies

Ok, I’m a “birther”, so those of you who hate “birthers”, start gearing up your diatribe and don’t bother reading the rest of my post.

The press conference with Sheriff Joe was certainly interesting and full of innuendo. Unfortunately, it was short on specifics. I would have preferred him to discuss some of the specifics his cold case team encountered that caused them to render the decision that they did.

Saying that they looked at everything over a 6 month period sounds good, but what were some of the discrepancies they found? I like Sheriff Joe and am a big fan, but I had hoped for something more definitive that I and the other “birthers” could hang our hats on.

So far, there is a lot of circumstantial evidence, but pretty much no one has provided anything that conclusively demonstrates clear proof of fraud and forgery. That means 1 of 2 things to me: either zero did a great job hiding his past and no one has been able to crack the fortress he has erected, or we have all been sucked into a massive conspiracy theory by people seeking to take zero down by any means possible.

I’m not ready to conceed the latter, but the information the sheriff provided today lacks substantiation and that’s what is needed to move forward.

“no one has provided anything that conclusively demonstrates clear proof of fraud and forgery”

What are you talking about??????????????

They just proved the BC and draft registration form FORGERIES! Did you not watch the news conference or watch the videos? WND.com

So far, there is a lot of circumstantial evidence, but pretty much no one has provided anything that conclusively demonstrates clear proof of fraud and forgery.

You mean you would like to have a high def video of the one and the forger actually designing the document and bragging about it as they post it? Something like that?

It all depends on what the meaning of "Is," Is, right?

I can only assume you’re kidding.

Just curious. Is it possible that you only watched the video featured at the ABC News site?

What I found at the ABC news link was only a couple minutes of introductory remarks. The press conference contained quite a few details and some video clips to sum up and illustrate key evidence, and a large part of the content was presented by the lead investigator from the Cold Case Posse, not Arpaio himself.

The press conference with Sheriff Joe was certainly interesting and full of innuendo. Unfortunately, it was short on specifics. I would have preferred him to discuss some of the specifics his cold case team encountered that caused them to render the decision that they did.

I interpret that "lack of specifics" in Sheriff Joe's presentation as strategic. Why should he telegraph his punches?