Perhaps, but I have seen a 4:18 clip, a 25:01 clip and a 0:30 clip all showing pretty much the same nothing. All he did was talk. There was something on the screens behind him that were not fully shown during the clips I saw and, perhaps, they showed something of interest.
But he never referenced those screens and never went into detail about anything on them.
If there was more to his presentation then, yes, I didn't watch all of it. I would think that, if there were something that revealed anything that I am wanting to see, I would have hoped they would have made it onto one of those video clips I saw.
Unfortunately, I just don't have the time to sort through hours of YouTube clips trying to spot something of interest from his presentation. I'm not seeking a doctoral presentation that goes through every line and color shift, just something simple that conclusively shows he has done a thorough analysis of the documents and has found markers that prove forgery.