Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muir_redwoods; RitaOK; xzins
I believe “Navajo” was in common use long before anyone applied for a copyright. The law-maggots might not care and the Pharisees they work with will rule “no” but common use is fair use in any reasonable mind.

First of all it is a TRADEMARK and not a copyright. Trademarks do not expire. Copyrights do. The Navajo Nation has a legitimate recognized trademark for their hand crafted items that they want to protect and this law only applies to arts and crafts and not to generic items.

For instance, if you wanted to use the term Navajo for a brand of motorcycle, then the trademark restriction would not apply.

I side with the Navajo's on this one.

21 posted on 02/29/2012 11:59:18 AM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe; muir_redwoods; RitaOK; xzins

Especially if Urban Outfitters is intentionally or unintentionally giving the impression they are dealing in authentic Navajo arts, crafts they are seriously at fault.

In addition to a Trademark violation it is also deceit.


26 posted on 02/29/2012 12:37:11 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

So you’re predicting bad news for my new business, the Coca-cola Cola Company?


33 posted on 02/29/2012 12:59:16 PM PST by LikeARock (Liberty or Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson