Paul is correct about some things such as our military might spread too thin. I would agree with him to get them out and bring them home. What Paul said about Bush and Cheney I would never forgive him.
Paul also presents the Al Qaeda point of view when it comes to conflict in Muslim countries. It would be one thing if he were just a non-interventionist; but on many points he’s downright anti-American.
I agree about Paul. I’ve grown to despise the nasty little gnome but I agree with him about the troops.
Not for his reasons but because I am sick and tired of deploying troops into those countries. We support a rebellion... the new leaders prove to be worse than the old.
What’s the point?
My theory would be to increase intelligence operations and bomb any nuclear facility that we feel is a danger, giving decent warning to clear the population.
They would probably ignore that as they don’t feel the same about human life as we do.
We only cater to them for oil while ignoring our own vast resources. How the heck does that happen in a sane world?