Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Waryone

See what I mean?

Hitler and Mussolini???

Two Obamas???

I’ve seen and heard MANY speeches by Newt, Rick, Romney, Cain, Michelle, Paul, etc. Romney happens to be the better speaker. That’s what I pointed out and it’s simple reality. It most definitely was true last night, and that was an important night. If Newt wants the nomination then why the heck did he come up so small last night?

Next, Romney is not Hitler or Mussolini, nor is he a duplicate Obama. But then I guess by your logic you will be more than glad to help reelect Obama if the GOP nominates Romney.

I respectfully suggest you actually listen to the republican candidates before you refer to Hitler, Mussolini or Obama.


62 posted on 02/29/2012 1:19:35 PM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Williams

Romney is a proved liar and you listen to him. That is all I need to know about your judgment. So no I won’t be following your suggestions.

Two Obamas = Obama and his melanin deficient twin Romney.

Well maybe they aren’t quite twins. An argument can be made that Romney is more liberal. After all Obama is not the father of Romneycare. Obama has not banned any guns. Obama has not legalized gay marriage anywhere. Obama has not signed a bill allowing $50.00 abortions. Those are all things “your conservative” Mittens has done. Though they both support gays in the military, global warming and forcing the Catholic church and religious people to violate their religion. Something that would cause the founders of our country great distress.

Because you choose to imagine Romney has done none of these things, you erroneously think we should be supporting him. There is no one, republican or democrat, running today who can say they have done as much for the liberal cause as Obama-white Romney or the other Obama. So yes they are very much alike. As a conservative, I have no desire to support either of the two most liberal candidates running.

I have heard Cain and Newt both give much better speeches than Romney because they believe what they say and people come far and near to see and hear them speak. When Romney speaks, he is board stiff, almost plastic and his words are like cardboard. That is not the quality of a good speaker. I’m not the only one who feels that way. Just take a look at the size of his crowds. He is supposedly the frontrunner but if the bleachers are not stuffed with his specially bussed in supporters, no one wants to see him or hear him speak.

You like his speech. I get that. You don’t care that his actions have run contrary to his word. I get that too. But don’t expect the rest of us to give up our principles for your delusions.


64 posted on 02/29/2012 1:52:27 PM PST by Waryone (Mitt Romney, dangerous homosexualist and lying socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson