[EDINVA]

I thought it was sarcasm, no ??

[Thane_Banquo]

Clearly sarcasm. Baier even added after, “Tongue out of cheek.”

[thouworm]

“I thought it was sarcasm, no ??”

Yes, Krauthammer was being sarcastic, at Obama’s well-deserved expense.

Next two lines of article:

“Tongue out of cheek,” host Bret Baier joked.

“I’m sorry that I brought the level of discussion so low,” Krauthammer joked back....

“How about the Arctic Wildlife Refuge? How about drilling on continental coast of the Atlantic or the Pacific? All these are shut down by the Democrats,” Krauthammer reminded Lane.

[Mercat]

Of course it was sarcasm. The previous poster is an idiot.

[brytlea]

It absolutely was sarcasm.

[Fightin Whitey]

Absolutely he was being sarcastic.

That’s why he ‘apologized’ for bringing the level of the conversation so low.

Krauthammer is D.C.-centric in a lot of ways but he was sneering at the commie-in-chief on this one.

[Lancey Howard]

"Why would you build a pipeline, the Keystone pipeline with real oil from Canada to put in real refineries and put in real existing cars when you can do algae? I think he is on to something. And I think this shows the vision, the hope and change he promised in 2008."

"Tongue out of cheek," host Bret Baier joked.

"I'm sorry that I brought the level of discussion so low," Krauthammer joked back.

Yes, it was sarcasm.
I'll be back later to see how many morons respond to the title (and maybe the first couple of paragraphs) and take Krauthammer to task.

FRegards,
LH

[southphilly]

It was “tongue in cheek” and very funny