To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3
Your opinion seems to be she isnt doing as much as Newt so she should shut up. So to be consistent you arent doing as much as Sarah Palin so you should shut up. See I dont believe you should shut up.
WRONG. Nowhere have I suggested or even hinted that Sarah should "shut up". Kindly do not assign an obvious untruth to me. What I (and Sam btw) have pointed out is that Sarah has far less to risk with her utterances and proclamations because she is NOT a candidate. Newt IS a candidate and what he says and does on ANY topic will have a far greater impact on how his presidential campaign ends up, and I'm devoutly hoping it will end with him taking the Oath of Office in January 2013. Now Sarah on the other hand? If she catches Hell for what she says or does, it's no big deal, she continues on with her Fox News gig and lives happily ever after.
I am just pointing out your hypocrisy.
No, you're behaving like a mad little puppy barking at a chew toy that won't squeak.
183 posted on
02/24/2012 5:01:08 PM PST by
mkjessup
(Romney is to conservatism what e.coli is to an all-you-can-eat salad bar. NO ROMNEY!!!)
To: mkjessup
“have pointed out is that Sarah has far less to risk with her utterances and proclamations because she is NOT a candidate.”
So what? And you and I have far less to risk than Sarah. Her opinion matters to alot more people than yours or mine. The reason I got into this argument in the first place is that your first post said that all she was doing was cheering from the stands. I wanted you to tell us how much more you were doing than Sarah and you got offended. If you are going to criticize people for doing too little then you better be ready to receive some criticism back.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson