[Rapscallion]

By calling it a “contraceptive” issue they re-frame the debate. Contraception is a personal choice. The real issue is aborting fetuses and the government dictating that some pharmacy must dispense the chemicals to abort human fetuses.

[rollo tomasi]

"The real issue is aborting fetuses and the government dictating that some pharmacy must dispense the chemicals to abort human fetuses."

Unfortunately most people are content with killing the unborn for convenience, hence why has abortion laws lingered for so long (Roe v. Wade is not amended to the Constitution).

No this round is about religious freedom and freedom of association. If we lose this battle, the whole war is lost.

[El Cid]

By calling it a “contraceptive” issue they re-frame the debate. Contraception is a personal choice. The real issue is aborting fetuses and the government dictating that some pharmacy must dispense the chemicals to abort human fetuses.

I was about to post a similar comment.
The real argument is with abortions and forcing churches (and other taxpayers) to support such abominations.
There is a valid issue that the First Amendment protects Religious institutions from being forced by the Government to take actions which are against their beliefs. In that respect the Roman Catholic church is correct to oppose the Obama's Administration actions regarding their being forced to fund of contraception.
But the argument should be focused on abortion.
The Obama administration and their allies are trying to force Christian institutions to support the worship of Molech (baby sacrifice)...