The judge in Georgia accepted dicta as being “persuasive” despite the fact that the Ankeny decision never declared Obama to be born in the United States NOR did it declare him to be a natural-born citizen. Ankeny used an unprecedented assumption to say it did NOT need to accept the plaintiffs’ argument, which it dishonestly misrepresented anyway. Hopefully this will be made very clear on appeal. There’s NO precedent in Ankeny to make Obama natural-born citizen. NONE.
Yet it is certain that more judges will come to the same conclusion. Apart from Leo I don’t see much grumbling on the legal blogs. It is almost as if Ankeny was not a controversial decision.