I think we have reached a point where we are pointing at the same information and reaching different conclusions.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
Ankeny / WKA is how the all these cases will be resolved. Obama will be deemed a NBC. That seems pretty clear to me - I understand you vehemently disagree.
Time will tell.
WKA affirmed the Minor definition of NBC and that NBC is NOT defined by the 14th amendment. Ankeny said the same thing without understanding that they said so. Ankeny then lied and contradicted themselves, all to reach a conclusion that is NOT based on an actual legal precedent. They claimed a question was left open about the children of aliens being NBCs, which simply is not true. The only legal precedent about such children from WKA is that the parents must be resident aliens, i.e., those with permanent residence and domicil in order to satisfy the subject clause of the 14th amendment. It is a separate class of citizenship and is NOT the same thing as NBC.
Time will tell.
No, anybody who agrees with you will be wrong, and the rest of us will still be correct.
The problem is that people on your side are too stupid (lacking in intellectual capacity) to comprehend our argument. Your side is still Geocentric in it's beliefs. You need to drop your foolish certainty and learn how to deal with things that simply will not FIT into your theory.