Oh golly. I didn’t copy the ENTIRE article. Just provided a link to the rest. How evil of me...
The citizenship of WKA was the point of the case, and that on which they heard arguments. Unlike Minor, which depended on the question, “Does every citizen have the right to vote?”
What WKA wrote about NBC/NBS was NOT irrelevant to the case, but central. Not that I expect a birther to understand it, since birthers don’t actually READ anything.