All hail Harlan1196! Keeper and dispenser of knowledge of all things legislative
and determiner of that which shall and shall not be believed!
@There is no such thing as Positive law. It is a meaningless legal term.
Your crown, sire.
And where can we find judicial acknowledgement of the “error” in Ankeny? Why that’s right - we can’t. It’s just a bunch of birthers making stuff up again.
Get back to me when you get a real victory in a real court - OK?
So by way of holding or ruling how is Wong Kim Ark a relevant SCOTUS case on the issue of NBC?
BTW, the dicta in WKA isn't a holding or a ruling so don't even try it.
Right. When it's murdering a baby or making Homosexual sex legal, it isn't right until a court says so.
Get back to us when you can think for yourself.
All hail Harlan1196! Keeper and dispenser of knowledge of all things legislative
and determiner of that which shall and shall not be believed!
@There is no such thing as Positive law. It is a meaningless legal term.
Your crown, sire.
God didn't give you a brain to make excuses for what's right there in plain English. What part do you specifically not understand or disagree with?? Notice that the ALJ in Georgia for example, did not cite a legal precedent from Ankeny, but instead said he found their argument to be "persuasive."