Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

Lots of people have well researched legal theories that are completely wrong.

Every case that goes before a judge has a winner and a loser. The losers are smart guys who are convinced that they are still right. But they are still losers.

Leo is one such loser. His theories have gained absolutely no traction either within or outside of any court. He has lost every case. Every case that uses his theories has lost.

That’s how things work in the legal system. You just can’t stand up and declare that you are right. You have to fight those that have different ideas and you have to prevail in a court of law.

When you can point to real victories in real courts then perhaps you can say that you and Leo are right. You cannot say that at the moment without ignoring a harsh dose of reality.


179 posted on 02/24/2012 11:50:18 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: Harlan1196
Every case that goes before a judge has a winner and a loser. The losers are smart guys who are convinced that they are still right. But they are still losers.

Leo is one such loser. His theories have gained absolutely no traction either within or outside of any court. He has lost every case. Every case that uses his theories has lost.

So you are defending the winning side in Dred Scott v Sanford because they won? How about Plessey v Ferguson? Were they correct because they won? Roe v Wade? Lawrence v Texas? (you probably ESPECIALLY agree with that ruling.)

What a turd you are.

That’s how things work in the legal system. You just can’t stand up and declare that you are right. You have to fight those that have different ideas and you have to prevail in a court of law.

Great theory. If only someone could get into the courthouse and present their evidence. It's like a drag race where you are not allowed to get into the car, and the referees are wearing the Uniform of your competitor.

When you can point to real victories in real courts then perhaps you can say that you and Leo are right. You cannot say that at the moment without ignoring a harsh dose of reality.

Oh, I can definitely point to real victories in real courts, (see above) and you may count them as proving which side was correct, but to conservatives they only prove that the court system needs to get the sh*t beaten out of it.

Your theory of "Court win = Right" has justified Slavery, Abortion, Homosexuality, Land Theft, Civil Rights abuses, and Murder, but for you that is the "Gold Standard" of evidence. That pretty much tells us all we need to know about you.

189 posted on 02/24/2012 12:26:13 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson