Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

This liar says it’s relevant because he has endorsed Romney. If Mittens had said it, it would be irrelevant. Pathetic RINO hypocrit.


2 posted on 02/22/2012 10:00:04 AM PST by mardi59 (I'm not looking for MTV, I'm looking for MVP. Newt 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mardi59

“This liar says it’s relevant because he has endorsed Romney”

Wait, I don’t get it. Why wouldn’t a Santorum supporter say it’s relevant, too? Santorum’s not running away from the comments, right? He and his supporters believe saying the devil is after the U.S. is no different from Reagan’s Evil Empire comments. Certainly there’s no scruples in Santy’s camp over inserting religion into politics when and wherever they can. So what’s the issue, here?


8 posted on 02/22/2012 10:12:10 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mardi59

there’s = there’re


9 posted on 02/22/2012 10:13:04 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mardi59
Why is Santorum running away from what he said in 2008? Was he misleading the audience?

If he can dredge up something Newt said 20-30 years ago and try to make it relevant, you an be damned sure things Santorum said during the last presidential race, which produced the incumbent he hopes to challenge, are going to be fair game.

This double-standard is just another sad example of Santorum's personal hypocrisy.

28 posted on 02/22/2012 12:21:17 PM PST by newzjunkey (Consider: Santorum voted for Sotomayor, Obama's first choice for Supreme Court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson